Texas is one of the states that doesn’t care a lot about the liberals or their agenda.
They care about their Second Amendment rights and as the liberals are destroying the monuments, the Texans are starting to carry their weapons with them.
This will stop the criminals more than anything else.
Recently, one cop and a firearms instructor from Texas is protesting and give threats to the liberals. He claims that if a liberal gets caught destroying a monument, they will probably end up dead. Officer Phil Ryan explained that every Texan has the right to use deadly force in order to stop vandals.
He decided to write his opinion on the social media.
Ryan wrote: “As a police officer and police academy instructor, I am posting this as a public service announcement. In Texas, Criminal Mischief (Vandalism) is a crime. So, let’s say someone is defacing or destroying a monument or a statue, not that it happens, just a hypothetical. That would be Criminal Mischief under Texas Penal Code.”
According to the Texas Penal Code “Chapter 9.41,” every person has the right to use deadly force in order to stop vandalism.
Furthermore, he claims that “Chapter 9.42,” allows the use of deadly force in the instance of “criminal mischief during the nighttime, citing the Texas Penal Code that goes as follows:Sec. 28.03. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF.
(a) A person commits an offense if, without the effective consent of the owner:
(1) he intentionally or knowingly damages or destroys the tangible property of the owner;
(2) he intentionally or knowingly tampers with the tangible property of the owner and causes pecuniary loss or substantial inconvenience to the owner or a third person; or
(3) he intentionally or knowingly makes markings, including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the tangible property of the owner.”
The Texas Penal Code Chapter 9 contains of laws that allow the use of deadly force in order to protect yourself, another person or a property (yours, to the state, the county of municial property.)
“In Chapter 9 under defense of property it says:
Sec. 9.43. PROTECTION OF THIRD PERSON’S PROPERTY.
A person is justified in using force or deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property of a third person if, under the circumstances as he reasonably believes them to be, the actor would be justified under Section 9.41 or 9.42 in using force or deadly force to protect his own land or property and:
(1) the actor reasonably believes the unlawful interference constitutes attempted or consummated theft of or criminal mischief to the tangible, movable property.”
Furthermore, “Chapter 9.41 states: PROTECTION OF ONE’S OWN PROPERTY.
(a) A person in lawful possession of land or tangible, movable property is justified in using force against another when and to the degree the actor reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent or terminate the other’s trespass on the land or unlawful interference with the property (Criminal Mischief is unlawful interference with property).”
Finally, “Chapter 9.42 states: DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY.
A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible, movable property:
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other’s imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal mischief during the nighttime (Night time is 30 minutes after sunset until 30 minutes before sunrise).”
He finished his statement by writting: “Bottom line, if someone is destroying a monument or statue that isn’t theirs, you can defend it by force during the day with deadly force at night. Just a little tip, from your Uncle Phil.”
It doesn’t seem like the Texans will put up with the behavior from the liberals anymore.
Scroll down to the comments and tell us what you think.